Clinical Trial: Impact of Different Educational Approaches on Post-operative Opiate Utilization After Elective Lower Extremity Surgery

Study Status: Recruiting
Recruit Status: Recruiting
Study Type: Interventional

Official Title: The Effect of an Educational Pain Approach Before Elective Lower-extremity Surgery on 6-month Post-operative Use of Opioid Medication: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of post-operative opioid use after two different educational interventions. The investigators will compare changes in pain, disability and sleep between groups 6 months after elective lower extremity surgery.

Detailed Summary:

Hypothesis: The primary hypothesis is that the educational intervention provided prior to the surgery and prior to the prescription, will result in a greater understanding and awareness of the deleterious effects of long-term use of opioid based medications, and in turn reduce utilization post-operatively in the long-term (6 months).

Specific Aim 1: Evaluate prescription opioid medication use for the 6-month period after surgery in subjects that received the education compared to those that received usual care education.

Specific Aim 2: Compare the changes in self-reported outcome measures (pain, disability, and sleep) between groups over the 6-month period after surgery.

Specific Aim 3: Describe the sociodemographic factors and healthcare utilization in enrolled subjects for the 12 months leading up to a surgical procedure. Identify factors that could account for differences in opioid medication utilization, and any potential interaction effect between intervention, opioid use, and clinical outcomes following surgery.

Study Procedures/Research Interventions:

Subjects will be randomized to either receive usual care only or usual care plus the education video. Usual care is defined as typical information the surgeon would otherwise provide the patient before surgery. All patients will receive the usual care education from their surgeon.

Randomization:

Subjects will then be randomized into one of two arms (Group I = Educational Video, Group II= Usual Care Only). The method of group assignment will be sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes (SNOSE). To minimize the risk of p
Sponsor: Brooke Army Medical Center

Current Primary Outcome: Opiate Prescriptions [ Time Frame: 6 months ]

Total opiate prescriptions


Original Primary Outcome: Opiate Prescriptions [ Time Frame: 6 months ]

Total opiate prescriptions and total opiate prescription days


Current Secondary Outcome:

  • Numeric Pain Rating Scale [ Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months ]
    A 0-10 numeric pain rating scale ('0' indicating no pain, and '10' worst imaginable pain) will be used to assess LBP intensity. Numeric pain scales are known to have excellent test-retest reliability.
  • PROMIS-29 [ Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months ]
    The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) 29-item short form (version 2) to assess disability. The PROMIS 29-item short form efficiently assesses several outcomes important to patients with a neuromusculoskeletal injury, including pain intensity and interference, sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and social role participation using items developed with rigorous methodology and patient input. The PROMIS-29 scores have been found valid for patients with orthopedic injuries, with minimum clinically important change thresholds of 2-4 points for most scales. It has also been used to successfully measure psychosocial resiliency in patients with disability.


Original Secondary Outcome:

  • Opioid Risk Tool [ Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months ]
    The Opioid Risk Tool is a validated tool to assess the risk of narcotic abuse in patients with chronic pain. It stratifies risk based on age, gender, history of abuse, and psychological disease. A score of 3 or lower indicates low risk for future opioid abuse, a score of 4 to 7 indicates moderate risk for opioid abuse, and a score of 8 or higher indicates a high risk for opioid abuse. This tool, based on the way that the questions are asked, cannot imply whether the subject currently has a substance abuse issue or a history of one.
  • Numeric Pain Rating Scale [ Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months ]
    A 0-10 numeric pain rating scale ('0' indicating no pain, and '10' worst imaginable pain) will be used to assess LBP intensity. Numeric pain scales are known to have excellent test-retest reliability.
  • Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) [ Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months ]
    The PCS is a 13-item patient-report scale developed to measure the extent to which people catastrophize in response to pain. Each item is scored from 0 ('not at all') to 4 ('all the time'). The PCS is reported as a total score, with higher scores indicating greater catastrophizing, and is composed of three sub-scales: Rumination (four items; e.g. 'When I am in pain, I keep thinking about how badly I want the pain to stop'), Magnification (three items; e.g. 'When I am in pain, I become afraid that the pain will get worse'), and Helplessness (six items; e.g. 'When I am in pain, I feel I can't go on') The PCS has been shown to have high levels of internal consistency and construct validity.
  • PROMIS-29 [ Time Frame: baseline, 1 month, 6 months ]
    The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information Systems (PROMIS) 29-item short form (version 2) to assess disability. The PROMIS 29-item short form efficiently assesses several outcomes important to patients with a neuromusculoskeletal injury, including pain intensity and interference, sleep disturbance, anxiety, depression, fatigue, and social role participation using items developed with rigorous methodology and patient input. The PROMIS-29 scores have been found valid for patients with orthopedic injuries,49 with minimum clinically important change thresholds of 2-4 points for most scales. It has also been used to successfully measure psychosocial resiliency in patients with disability.


Information By: Brooke Army Medical Center

Dates:
Date Received: December 6, 2016
Date Started: June 2016
Date Completion: December 2018
Last Updated: December 19, 2016
Last Verified: December 2016